The Impact of Political Geography on Wisconsin Redistricting: An Analysis of Wisconsin's Act 43 Assembly Districting Plan
نویسنده
چکیده
This article illustrates how the relationship between political geography and the electoral bias of a districting plan, as measured by the efficiency gap, can be analyzed in a statistically rigorous manner using computer simulations of the legislative redistricting process. By generating a large number of different districting plans designed to optimize on traditional redistricting criteria, the computer simulation process demonstrates the range of districting plans that would likely emerge from a neutral, non-gerrymandered process. Courts and litigants can then draw inferences by comparing the efficiency gap of an enacted districting plan against this range of simulated plans. I use this method to illustrate how Wisconsin’s Act 43 created an Assembly districting plan with an extreme, Republican-favoring efficiency gap that would not have been possible under a map-drawing process that prioritizes traditional redistricting criteria.
منابع مشابه
Measuring a Gerrymander
There is no such thing as a fair or non-partisan districting plan. Whether intentionally or blindly, such plans involve political choices and have critical effects on the political parties. The various "proposed public interest criteria for redistricting...are not neutral, they are not grounded in broader principles that command general assent, and in many cases they are incoherent and cannot b...
متن کاملBARD: Better Automated Redistricting
BARD is the first (and at time of writing, only) open source software package for general redistricting and redistricting analysis. BARD provides methods to create, display, compare, edit, automatically refine, evaluate, and profile political districting plans. BARD aims to provide a framework for scientific analysis of redistricting plans and to facilitate wider public participation in the cre...
متن کاملReformers, politicians, and the courts: a preliminary look at US redistricting in the 1980s
This paper reviews a variety of criteria which have been proposed for legislative and congressional redistricting in the US and discusses the political and legal factors which have shaped 1980s redistricting. Particular attention is paid to the conflicts of interest between incumbents (seeking re-election), party organizations (seeking aggregate partisan advantage), minority interests (seeking ...
متن کاملWhy Weight? A Cluster-Theoretic Approach to Political Districting
Political districting has been one of the most contentious issues within American politics over the last two centuries. Since the landmark case of Baker v. Carr, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the constitutionality of a state’s legislated districting is within the jurisdiction of a federal court, many within academia have attempted to produce a rigorous system for determini...
متن کاملExamples that illustrate how compactness and respect for political boundaries can lead to partisan bias when redistricting
To reduce the unfairness incurred by partisan districting, citizen reformers usually advocate applying the conventional criteria of compactness and respect for political boundaries of subdivisions. Simple examples are constructed to address whether optimizing these criteria also minimizes partisan bias, measured as the difference between the seats-votes curves for the two parties. One set of ex...
متن کامل